Registrare Marchio

  • Who we are
    • Eva Troiani law firm: trademark registration and legal protection
    • The Project Registrare-Marchio.com
  • Trademark consultancy
    • The Verification of Trademark’s Requirements
    • Trademark Search: identity and similarity
    • Where to register a trademark
    • Filing a Trademark Application
    • Graphic Creation of a Trademark
    • Trademark protection: the surveillance service
  • Trademark legal assistance
    • Trademark defense from objections of the Trademark Office
    • Trademark defense from disputes
    • Trademark Opposition Proceedings
    • Trademark Assignment and Licence Agreement
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Certification
    • EUIPO Webinar 2023
    • SEE Webinar 2023
  • LANGUAGES
    • English English
    • Italiano Italiano
  • The trademark
    • What a Trademark is
    • How to Conceive a Brand
    • Types of Trademarks
    • Denominative and Figurative Trademark
    • Collective Trademark
    • Color Trademark
    • Position Mark
    • Slogan Trademark
    • New marks
    • Unregistered trademark
    • Deceptive Trademark
    • Trademark with Reputation
    • Family of trademarks: what they are
    • Invalid Trademark and Revocation
    • Trademark symbols which can be used in Italy: ™ and ®
    • Value of a brand
    • Trademark assignment
    • Trademark Licence agreements
    • Right of Priority of a Trademark
    • Validation of a trademark
    • Limitations of the Right on the Trademark
    • How to Avoid Complaints to a Trademark
    • Read more
  • Registering a trademark
    • Why to Register a Trademark
    • Who is Entitled to Register a Trademark
    • Filing and Registering a Trademark
    • Nice Classification – 11 edition 2022
    • Duration of a trademark
    • Registering a logo or Registering a brand?
    • How much it costs to register a trademark
    • Graphic changes to a registered trademark
    • Trademark Registration in Italy
    • Registering the European Union trademark
    • Registering an international trademark
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN EUROPE
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN THE MIDDLE EAST
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN ASIA
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN NORTH AMERICA
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN LATIN AMERICA
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN AFRICA
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN OCEANIA
    • read more
  • Mistakes not to be made
    • 10 errors not to do with trademark
    • Lack of distinctive character of a mark
    • Vulgarization of Trademark
    • Signs become customary cannot be registered as trademarks
  • Further considerations
    • CASE LAW AND TRADEMARK
    • DISTINCTIVE CHARACTER OF A TRADEMARK
    • CONTRACTS RELATED TO TRADEMARKS
    • TRADEMARKS AND BAD FAITH
    • COUNTERFEITS AND MISLEADING INDICATIONS
    • UNFAIR COMPETITION
    • GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS
    • EUROPEAN UNION TRADEMARK
    • COPYRIGHT
  • News
    • Read posts
  • Guest corner

Home FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS ON TRADEMARKS CONTRACTS RELATED TO TRADEMARKS Trademark coexistence agreements

Trademark coexistence agreements

by Admin / Thursday, 29 March 2018 / Published in CONTRACTS RELATED TO TRADEMARKS

Trademark coexistence agreements are particular type of contracts, frequently used to settle the relationships between the holders of identical or similar trademarks.

Trademark coexistence agreements

In this post we talk about:

  • Examples of trademark coexistence agreements
  • Trademark coexistence agreements: a clothing case
  • How to enter into a trademark coexistence agreement

Article 20 of the Italian Industrial property Code forbids third parties the use of

“signs which are identical or similar to a registered trademark for identical or similar goods or ser-vices” and forbids the use of “identical or similar signs for goods or services which are not similar whether the registered trademark enjoys in the State of renown”

unless there is the consent of the owner of the registered trademark.

The proprietor of the mark, therefore, may allow the coexistence on the market of trademarks which are potentially confusable with its own, provided that there is not a risk of misleading the public: an insurmountable limit must be seen in the ban of deceiving public, as stated in the Article 21, paragraph 2 of the Italian Industrial Property Code, according to which:

“it is not permitted to use the trademark in a manner contrary to law or, in particular, so as to create a likelihood of confusion in the market with other signs … or to induce, however, mislead the public”.

Examples of trademark coexistence agreements

Coexistence agreements are characterized by a large variety of content, but they are intended to govern the relationships between the owners of trademarks and to avoid the risk of deception to the public. Some examples of provisions you can find in a coexistence agreement are the following:

  • Clauses of limitation regarding the use and registration of trademarks in some classes or with re-gard to some products / services.
    It is generally the proprietor of the later mark to undertake not to use/register its trademark for some goods and/or services, but there may be cases of undertaking by both parties of the contract.
    One of the most famous cases of trademark coexistence agreement was the agreement between Apple Crops and Apple Inc. The first owned by The Beatles, the famous British musical band, the second owned by Steve Jobs, owner of one of the most famous companies in the world of com-puters and more. The agreement provided that Apple Corps would have tolerated the presence of Apple incorporation’s brand on condition that this latter will never enter in the music industry. But then Itunes and Ipod were born. In this article you can find the whole story:
  • Clause of limitation on the territory:
    for example, the owner of the mark “x” will undertake not to use or file trademark applications in one or more Countries. Sometimes, this undertaking may be mutual, i.e. the owner of the mark “x” undertakes not to use or file its trademark in a Country (for instance, in Japan) in exchange of the undertaking of the owner of the trademark “y” not to use and file its trademark in another Country (for example, Russian Federation)
  • Clause regarding the method of use of the mark:
    for example, the owner of the mark “x” under-takes to always use its trademark in combination with the words “white” and “green” and never alone;
  • Clause of mutual assistance:
    for example through the provision of the undertaking to grant letter of consent to the registration of the other party’s trademark, if necessary.

Trademark coexistence agreements: a clothing case

In its judgment n. 10 of February 4, 2015, the Italian Board of Appeals stated about the validity of trademark coexistence agreements and about the relationship between coexistence agreements and the risk of confusion or association among the marks covered by the agreement.

In the event which generated the matter in question, the marks in comparison were almost identical (there was, in theory, the risk of confusion) but some years ago their respective owners signed a coexistence agreement authorizing the holder of the later trademark to use its sign for the products included in the category of clothing, with the exception of “clothing specifically intended for cyclists”.

The validity of coexistence agreement was challenged by the owner of the earlier marks, who filed an opposition against trademark application filed by the owner of subsequent trademark.

During its examination, the Italian Patent and Trademark Office upheld the opposition and denied relevance of the coexistence agreement, arguing that the same

“could not be considered binding on third parties other than the contracting parties. Undoubtedly these agreements generate obligations on the parties, but they are not capable in themselves of es-tablishing the absence of a likelihood of confusion to the detriment of consumers”.

Italian Board of Appeal (“Commissione dei Ricorsi”) has taken a different position, considering the reason given by the Italian Patent and Trademark Office insufficient to deny the validity of the co-existence agreement and stated that

“the current coexistence agreement between the parties is able to exclude actual risks of confusion or association between the marks in question”.

On one hand, the Italian Board of Appeals recognizes the correctness of the assumption according to which the coexistence agreements have effect only between the parties, but on the other hand states that the problem of the effectiveness against third parties essentially arises for the transmis-sibility to third parties of the obligations generated by the agreement, with particular reference to the case of the sale of company. In the case in question, therefore, the problem does not arise since the parties which originally executed the coexistence agreement (and not other parties) are directly involved.

The opinion of the Italian Board of Appeals is that we cannot deny relevance to a coexistence agreement when we determine the likelihood of confusion between the marks.

The Board of Appeals specifies that

“More precisely, it must be considered that coexistence agreement can be said valid only if, and in-sofar as, prevent for the future the risk of confusion for the public. If, in fact, the content of the agreement allows a confusable and deceptive use of the marks, the same agreement should be considered void for illegality of the cause (contrary to public policy statement). In addition, a specif-ic reason for invalidity could be find in the incompatibility of the agreement with the prohibition of agreement restricting competition”.

How to enter into a trademark coexistence agreement

Eva Troiani law firm can certainly assist you in the signing of a trademark coexistence agreement. We suggest to get in touch with professionals in IP sector because, in addition to the prohibition of misleading the public and because of their nature of agreements, they must comply the legislation governing them.

Summary
Trademark coexistence agreements
Titolo articolo
Trademark coexistence agreements
Description
Trademark coexistence agreements are used to regulate the relationship between the owners of identical or similar trademarks in order to avoid the risk of the deception of the public. Let’s see the most common types of agreements.
Author
Eva Troiani
Publisher Name
Lawyer Eva Troiani - Registrare-marchio.com
Publisher Logo
Lawyer Eva Troiani - Registrare-marchio.com

Did you find this article interesting? Share it!

They may also be interested in these items

Validation of a trademark

Three types of unfair competition

Judgment of affinity between products

Eva Troiani

Eva Troiani (Attorney At Law)

Eva Troiani has been working for over 15 years dealing with all aspects of the trademark: from trademark application to trademark registration worldwide, providing assistance in the event of disputes; she proposes an extensive legal advice to companies and professionals. She is the author of all the articles in this website “registrar-marchio.com”, a project created with the aim of providing useful and updated information on the trademark’s world to all readers. You can follow the lawyer Eva Troiani also on her Linkedin profile.


 

Eva Troiani

Do you need assistance, advice or information? If you have an idea, do not let it steal!

Contact Eva Troiani’s law firm

For registration and protection of trademarks

The texts in this database are only for informational and scientific purposes and they are not to be considered official; we therefore decline any responsibility for possible errors or inaccuracies. All mentioned trademarks belong to their legitimate owners; trademarks, product names, trade names and the images of the products are the property of their respective owners. They are used in this database only for informational purposes, without any purpose of violating existing rights of others.
The information you obtained at this site is not, nor is intended to be, legal advice. You should consult Ms. Eva Troiani and/or a trademark attorney and/or an attorney at law handling with intellectual property for individual advice regarding any legal questions that you may have.

Find out why Mario decided to register his trademark

Register now your trademark!
Guest Corner

Last articles

  • Registrare un marchio in India (Trademark)

    Trademark Filings in India – Your Roadmap to Protection and Success!

    Colleague Ankita Malik explains in detail the t...
  • Tutela della voce nella giurisprudenza americana ai tempi dell'AI / voice protection in American jurisprudence

    Hey, that’s my voice! Can I sue them?

    My colleague Teresa Segalman explains what Amer...
  • Trade marks in Vietnam: “I want to overcome the refusal”!

    My colleague Nguyen Ngoc Thanh explains in deta...
  • Provisional Refusal in Japan-Rifiiuto provvisorio in Giappone

    Frequent Provisional Refusal in Japan

    A frequent ground for refusal refers to the mai...
  • Lack of distinctive character of a mark

    Lack of distinctive character of a mark

    : It is defined distinctive the sign able to id...

Category

  • THE TRADEMARK
  • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN EUROPE
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN THE MIDDLE EAST
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN ASIA
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN NORTH AMERICA
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN LATIN AMERICA
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN OCEANIA
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN AFRICA
  • MISTAKES NOT TO BE MADE WITH TRADEMARKS
  • INSIGHTS INTO BRAND
    • CASE LAW AND TRADEMARK
    • DISTINCTIVE CHARACTER OF A TRADEMARK
    • COPYRIGHT
    • CONTRACTS RELATED TO TRADEMARKS
    • TRADEMARKS AND BAD FAITH
    • COUNTERFEITS AND MISLEADING INDICATIONS
    • UNFAIR COMPETITION
    • GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS
    • EUROPEAN UNION TRADEMARK

Subscribe to the newsletter

come contattare l’Avv. Eva Troiani

+393382938021

Utility

  • Eva Troiani law firm: trademark registration and legal protection
  • The Project Registrare-Marchio.com
  • Where to register a trademark
  • The Verification of Trademark’s Requirements
  • Trademark Search: identity and similarity
  • Filing a Trademark Application
  • Graphic Creation of a Trademark
  • Trademark protection: the surveillance service for the protection of your brand
  • Trademark Opposition Proceedings
  • Trademark Assignment and Licence Agreement

Contact

Eva Troiani (Attorney At Law)

P. Iva IT07106461002
+39.338.29.38.021
info@marchiebrevettiroma.it
  • Who we are
    • Eva Troiani law firm: trademark registration and legal protection
    • The Project Registrare-Marchio.com
  • Trademark consultancy
    • The Verification of Trademark’s Requirements
    • Trademark Search: identity and similarity
    • Where to register a trademark
    • Filing a Trademark Application
    • Graphic Creation of a Trademark
    • Trademark protection: the surveillance service
  • Trademark legal assistance
    • Trademark defense from objections of the Trademark Office
    • Trademark defense from disputes
    • Trademark Opposition Proceedings
    • Trademark Assignment and Licence Agreement
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Certification
    • EUIPO Webinar 2023
    • SEE Webinar 2023
  • GET SOCIAL
Registrare Marchio

registrare-marchio.com | Avv. Eva Troiani © 2015 - All rights reserved | Cookie policy | Privacy policy
The contents of this site provide readers with general information and are not legal advice.
Powered by
Ip Coster

TOP

Questo sito fa uso di cookie tecnici per permettere una corretta navigazione agli utenti e cookie di terze parti (come Google Analytics, Maps, ReCapcha, etc..) per migliorarne la fruizione. Se vuoi saperne di più consulta la nostra Cookie Policy.

Questo sito utilizza i cookie per fornire la migliore esperienza di navigazione possibile. Continuando a utilizzare questo sito senza modificare le impostazioni dei cookie o cliccando su "Accetta" permetti il loro utilizzo.

Chiudi