Registrare Marchio

  • Who we are
    • Eva Troiani law firm: trademark registration and legal protection
    • The Project Registrare-Marchio.com
  • Trademark consultancy
    • The Verification of Trademark’s Requirements
    • Trademark Search: identity and similarity
    • Where to register a trademark
    • Filing a Trademark Application
    • Graphic Creation of a Trademark
    • Trademark protection: the surveillance service
  • Trademark legal assistance
    • Trademark defense from objections of the Trademark Office
    • Trademark defense from disputes
    • Trademark Opposition Proceedings
    • Trademark Assignment and Licence Agreement
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Certification
    • EUIPO Webinar 2023
    • SEE Webinar 2023
  • LANGUAGES
    • English English
    • Italiano Italiano
  • The trademark
    • What a Trademark is
    • How to Conceive a Brand
    • Types of Trademarks
    • Denominative and Figurative Trademark
    • Collective Trademark
    • Color Trademark
    • Position Mark
    • Slogan Trademark
    • New marks
    • Unregistered trademark
    • Deceptive Trademark
    • Trademark with Reputation
    • Family of trademarks: what they are
    • Invalid Trademark and Revocation
    • Trademark symbols which can be used in Italy: ™ and ®
    • Value of a brand
    • Trademark assignment
    • Trademark Licence agreements
    • Right of Priority of a Trademark
    • Validation of a trademark
    • Limitations of the Right on the Trademark
    • How to Avoid Complaints to a Trademark
    • Read more
  • Registering a trademark
    • Why to Register a Trademark
    • Who is Entitled to Register a Trademark
    • Filing and Registering a Trademark
    • Nice Classification – 11 edition 2022
    • Duration of a trademark
    • Registering a logo or Registering a brand?
    • How much it costs to register a trademark
    • Graphic changes to a registered trademark
    • Trademark Registration in Italy
    • Registering the European Union trademark
    • Registering an international trademark
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN EUROPE
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN THE MIDDLE EAST
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN ASIA
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN NORTH AMERICA
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN LATIN AMERICA
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN AFRICA
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN OCEANIA
    • read more
  • Mistakes not to be made
    • 10 errors not to do with trademark
    • Lack of distinctive character of a mark
    • Vulgarization of Trademark
    • Signs become customary cannot be registered as trademarks
  • Further considerations
    • CASE LAW AND TRADEMARK
    • DISTINCTIVE CHARACTER OF A TRADEMARK
    • CONTRACTS RELATED TO TRADEMARKS
    • TRADEMARKS AND BAD FAITH
    • COUNTERFEITS AND MISLEADING INDICATIONS
    • UNFAIR COMPETITION
    • GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS
    • EUROPEAN UNION TRADEMARK
    • COPYRIGHT
  • News
    • Read posts
  • Guest corner

Home MISTAKES NOT TO BE MADE WITH TRADEMARKS Vulgarization of Trademark

Vulgarization of Trademark

by Redazione / Friday, 30 March 2018 / Published in MISTAKES NOT TO BE MADE WITH TRADEMARKS

When can we talk of vulgarization? How is it possible to avoid that our trademark becomes vulgarized and, in the worst hypothesis, it is revoked?

trademark vulgarization

In this post we talk about:

  • Vulgarization of trademark and case-law
  • Examples of registered trademarks which become vulgarized over time
  • How to avoid that a trademark is revoked for vulgarization?

A registered trademark can be revoked if it becomes vulgarized, namely if – initially correctly perceived as an indicator of provenance of the products or services from a specific undertaking – it becomes the generic name of the entire category of products or services as time goes by.

In other words, if the so-called “vulgarization” phenomenon occurs, the public no longer perceives the link between the trademark and its owner, but it believes that the mark (be it a word, an image of something else) generically indicates an entire category of products (or services). The mark becomes generic name of the product (or service) for which it is registered.

In such cases, the brand has lost its value because it has lost its distinctive capacity. The vulgarized trademark loses any connection with the company and becomes the common name identifying all products (or services) of the same kind.

Vulgarization of trademark and case-law

The Article 13, 4) of the Italian Industrial Property Code provides that:

“A trademark is revoked if, as a consequence of any actions or of the inactivity of its holder, it has become in the trade the common name of a product or service or if it has lost its distinctive character”.

Similarly, Article 58, 1 b) of the EU Regulation N. 2017/1001 provides that:

“The rights of the proprietor of the EU trademark shall be declared to be revoked…if, in consequence of acts or inactivity of the proprietor, the trademark has become the common name in the trade for a product or service in respect of which it is registered”.

The case Kornspitz

You can find here below what stated by the Court of Justice in reference to the case of the mark Kornspitz and its vulgarization.

The Court of Justice has been asked to provide its own interpretation on Article 12, paragraph 2, letter a) of Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council , according to which:

“Without prejudice to paragraph 1, a trademark shall be liable to revocation if, after the date on which it was registered, in consequence of acts or inactivity of the proprietor, it has become the common name in the trade for a product or service in respect of which it is registered”.

The fact on which is based the decision of the Court of Justice is shortly summarized as follows:

The Austrian company Backaldrin registered Austrian trademark KORNSPITZ (denominative) for goods in class 30. This company produced, under that trademark, a baking mix which it supplies primarily to bakers, who turned such mix into a bread roll with a particular shape (oblong with pointed ends), then sold, in fact, with the name of KORNSPITZ.

Backaldrin consented to the use of that trademark by those bakers and the foodstuffs distributors supplied by them in the sale of that bread roll. The bakers and distributors of this product, however, did not care to inform the buyers of these products that KORNSPITZ was a registered trademark owned by Backaldrin; as a result, the end users of this product perceived that name as the generic name of the product.

The Court of Justice was asked to rule on the following three issues:

  1. Has a trademark become “the common name (in the trade) for a product or service within the meaning of Article 12, 2, a) of Directive 2008/95 where
    • Although traders know that mark constitutes an indication of origin they do not generally disclose this to end users and
    • “inter alia) on these grounds, end users no longer understand the trademark as an indication of origin but as the common name for goods or services in respect of which the trademark is registered
  2. Can the conduct of a proprietor be regarded as “inactivity” simply if the proprietor of the trademark remains inactive notwithstanding the fact that traders do not inform customers that the name is a registered trademark?
  3. If, as a consequence of act or inactivity of the proprietor, a trademark has become the common name for end users, but not in the trade, is that trademark liable to be revoked if, and only if, end consumers have to use this name because there are no equivalent alternatives?

The Court of Justice responded affirmatively to all three questions submitted to its examination, ruling that:

“1) Article 12,2 a) of Directive 2008/95…must be interpreted as meaning that, in a case such as that at issue in the main proceedings, a trademark is liable to revocation in respect of a product for which it is registered if, in consequence of acts or inactivity of the proprietor, that trademark has become the common name for that product from the point of view solely of end users of the product;

2) Article 12, 2 a) of Directive 2008/95 must be interpreted as meaning that it may be classified as “inactivity” within the meaning of that provision if the proprietor of a trademark does not encourage sellers to make more use of that mark in marketing a product in respect of which the mark is registered;

3) Article 12, 2, a) of Directive 2008/95 must be interpreted as meaning that the revocation of a trademark does not presuppose that it must be ascertained whether there are other names for a product for which that trademark has become the common name in the trade.”

Examples of registered trademarks which become vulgarized over time

There is a category of trademarks which risks the vulgarization, namely the marks which identify new products of a category, for which there do not exist words or adjectives that can describe them.

Some examples of famous trademarks become vulgarized are Corn Flakes, Cellophane, Premaman, Walkman, Rimmel, but also Kleenex, Kamut.

How many of you did use one of these brands as a generic name and not as a trademark?

How to avoid that a trademark is revoked for vulgarization?

It is important that trademark’s owner makes every effort in order to avoid trademark become vulgarized. Concretely, it is necessary that the owner does not use its trademark as generic name of the product, at the same time, it is necessary that defend its trademark in case someone use the mark in a descriptive way; for example, it could be useful to remind in the advertisements that the goods are protected by a registered trademark.

For this purpose, it is interesting to observe Article 12 of the EU trademark Regulation, namely:

“If the reproduction of a EU trademark in a dictionary, encyclopaedia or similar reference work gives the impression that it constitutes the generic name of the goods or services for which the trademark is registered, the publisher of the work shall, at the request of the proprietor of the EU trademark, ensure that the reproduction of the trademark at the latest in the next edition of the publication is accompanied by an indication that it is a registered trademark”.

This is an example of a rule that actually allows to the owner of a EU trademark to oppose to the descriptive use of its trademark and to oppose to vulgarization.

Where the owner has done all the best, namely everything reasonably be expected by him in order to avoid vulgarization, the mark cannot be cancelled.
This is what Ferrero did for the trademark Nutella and 3M for the trademarks Post-it and scotch, which obtained the addition of the ® symbol in the dictionary.

Where the owner has done all the best, namely everything reasonably be expected by him in order to avoid vulgarization, the mark cannot be cancelled.

Summary
Vulgarization of Trademark
Titolo articolo
Vulgarization of Trademark
Description
A registered trademark can be revoked if it is vulgarized, namely if it becomes the generic name of an entire category of products or services. Let’s see more in detail.
Author
Eva Troiani
Publisher Name
Lawyer Eva Troiani - Registrare-marchio.com
Publisher Logo
Lawyer Eva Troiani - Registrare-marchio.com

Did you find this article interesting? Share it!

They may also be interested in these items

Registered trademark: what it is and why it is important

Trademark protection: the surveillance service for the protection of your brand

10 errors not to do with trademark

Eva Troiani

Eva Troiani (Attorney At Law)

Eva Troiani has been working for over 15 years dealing with all aspects of the trademark: from trademark application to trademark registration worldwide, providing assistance in the event of disputes; she proposes an extensive legal advice to companies and professionals. She is the author of all the articles in this website “registrar-marchio.com”, a project created with the aim of providing useful and updated information on the trademark’s world to all readers. You can follow the lawyer Eva Troiani also on her Linkedin profile.


 

Eva Troiani

Do you need assistance, advice or information? If you have an idea, do not let it steal!

Contact Eva Troiani’s law firm

For registration and protection of trademarks

The texts in this database are only for informational and scientific purposes and they are not to be considered official; we therefore decline any responsibility for possible errors or inaccuracies. All mentioned trademarks belong to their legitimate owners; trademarks, product names, trade names and the images of the products are the property of their respective owners. They are used in this database only for informational purposes, without any purpose of violating existing rights of others.
The information you obtained at this site is not, nor is intended to be, legal advice. You should consult Ms. Eva Troiani and/or a trademark attorney and/or an attorney at law handling with intellectual property for individual advice regarding any legal questions that you may have.

Find out why Mario decided to register his trademark

Register now your trademark!
Guest Corner

Last articles

  • Registrare un marchio in India (Trademark)

    Trademark Filings in India – Your Roadmap to Protection and Success!

    Colleague Ankita Malik explains in detail the t...
  • Tutela della voce nella giurisprudenza americana ai tempi dell'AI / voice protection in American jurisprudence

    Hey, that’s my voice! Can I sue them?

    My colleague Teresa Segalman explains what Amer...
  • Trade marks in Vietnam: “I want to overcome the refusal”!

    My colleague Nguyen Ngoc Thanh explains in deta...
  • Provisional Refusal in Japan-Rifiiuto provvisorio in Giappone

    Frequent Provisional Refusal in Japan

    A frequent ground for refusal refers to the mai...
  • Lack of distinctive character of a mark

    Lack of distinctive character of a mark

    : It is defined distinctive the sign able to id...

Category

  • THE TRADEMARK
  • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN EUROPE
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN THE MIDDLE EAST
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN ASIA
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN NORTH AMERICA
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN LATIN AMERICA
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN OCEANIA
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN AFRICA
  • MISTAKES NOT TO BE MADE WITH TRADEMARKS
  • INSIGHTS INTO BRAND
    • CASE LAW AND TRADEMARK
    • DISTINCTIVE CHARACTER OF A TRADEMARK
    • COPYRIGHT
    • CONTRACTS RELATED TO TRADEMARKS
    • TRADEMARKS AND BAD FAITH
    • COUNTERFEITS AND MISLEADING INDICATIONS
    • UNFAIR COMPETITION
    • GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS
    • EUROPEAN UNION TRADEMARK

Subscribe to the newsletter

come contattare l’Avv. Eva Troiani

+393382938021

Utility

  • Eva Troiani law firm: trademark registration and legal protection
  • The Project Registrare-Marchio.com
  • Where to register a trademark
  • The Verification of Trademark’s Requirements
  • Trademark Search: identity and similarity
  • Filing a Trademark Application
  • Graphic Creation of a Trademark
  • Trademark protection: the surveillance service for the protection of your brand
  • Trademark Opposition Proceedings
  • Trademark Assignment and Licence Agreement

Contact

Eva Troiani (Attorney At Law)

P. Iva IT07106461002
+39.338.29.38.021
info@marchiebrevettiroma.it
  • Who we are
    • Eva Troiani law firm: trademark registration and legal protection
    • The Project Registrare-Marchio.com
  • Trademark consultancy
    • The Verification of Trademark’s Requirements
    • Trademark Search: identity and similarity
    • Where to register a trademark
    • Filing a Trademark Application
    • Graphic Creation of a Trademark
    • Trademark protection: the surveillance service
  • Trademark legal assistance
    • Trademark defense from objections of the Trademark Office
    • Trademark defense from disputes
    • Trademark Opposition Proceedings
    • Trademark Assignment and Licence Agreement
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Certification
    • EUIPO Webinar 2023
    • SEE Webinar 2023
  • GET SOCIAL
Registrare Marchio

registrare-marchio.com | Avv. Eva Troiani © 2015 - All rights reserved | Cookie policy | Privacy policy
The contents of this site provide readers with general information and are not legal advice.
Powered by
Ip Coster

TOP

Questo sito fa uso di cookie tecnici per permettere una corretta navigazione agli utenti e cookie di terze parti (come Google Analytics, Maps, ReCapcha, etc..) per migliorarne la fruizione. Se vuoi saperne di più consulta la nostra Cookie Policy.

Questo sito utilizza i cookie per fornire la migliore esperienza di navigazione possibile. Continuando a utilizzare questo sito senza modificare le impostazioni dei cookie o cliccando su "Accetta" permetti il loro utilizzo.

Chiudi