Registrare Marchio

  • Who we are
    • Eva Troiani law firm: trademark registration and legal protection
    • The Project Registrare-Marchio.com
  • Trademark consultancy
    • The Verification of Trademark’s Requirements
    • Trademark Search: identity and similarity
    • Where to register a trademark
    • Filing a Trademark Application
    • Graphic Creation of a Trademark
    • Trademark protection: the surveillance service
  • Trademark legal assistance
    • Trademark defense from objections of the Trademark Office
    • Trademark defense from disputes
    • Trademark Opposition Proceedings
    • Trademark Assignment and Licence Agreement
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • LANGUAGES
    • English English
    • Italiano Italiano
  • The trademark
    • What a Trademark is
    • How to Conceive a Brand
    • Types of Trademarks
    • Denominative and Figurative Trademark
    • Collective Trademark
    • Color Trademark
    • Position Mark
    • Slogan Trademark
    • New marks
    • Unregistered trademark
    • Deceptive Trademark
    • Trademark with Reputation
    • Family of trademarks: what they are
    • Invalid Trademark and Revocation
    • Trademark symbols which can be used in Italy: ™ and ®
    • Value of a brand
    • Trademark assignment
    • Trademark Licence agreements
    • Right of Priority of a Trademark
    • Validation of a trademark
    • Limitations of the Right on the Trademark
    • How to Avoid Complaints to a Trademark
    • Read more
  • Registering a trademark
    • Why to Register a Trademark
    • Who is Entitled to Register a Trademark
    • Filing and Registering a Trademark
    • Nice Classification – 11 edition 2022
    • Duration of a trademark
    • Registering a logo or Registering a brand?
    • How much it costs to register a trademark
    • Graphic changes to a registered trademark
    • Trademark Registration in Italy
    • Registering the European Union trademark
    • Registering an international trademark
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN EUROPE
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN THE MIDDLE EAST
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN ASIA
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN NORTH AMERICA
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN LATIN AMERICA
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN AFRICA
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN OCEANIA
    • read more
  • Mistakes not to be made
    • 10 errors not to do with trademark
    • Lack of distinctive character of a mark
    • Vulgarization of Trademark
    • Signs become customary cannot be registered as trademarks
  • Further considerations
    • CASE LAW AND TRADEMARK
    • DISTINCTIVE CHARACTER OF A TRADEMARK
    • CONTRACTS RELATED TO TRADEMARKS
    • TRADEMARKS AND BAD FAITH
    • COUNTERFEITS AND MISLEADING INDICATIONS
    • UNFAIR COMPETITION
    • GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS
    • EUROPEAN UNION TRADEMARK
    • COPYRIGHT
  • News
    • Read posts
  • Guest corner

Home GUEST CORNER Trademark cancellation for lack of use, a strategy not always reliable

l'angolo dell'ospite
l'angolo dell'ospite

Trademark cancellation for lack of use, a strategy not always reliable

kelly Sanchez

This article is written by: Kelly Sanchez

Lawyer specialized in Intellectual Property Law. Like the other members of the OMC Abogados & Consultores team, her function is to carry out the process for the registration of trademarks and patents at the National Institute for the Defense of Competition and the Protection of Intellectual Property: INDECOPI. One of her another tasks is to collaborate with the attention of several inquiries, as well as to communicate the client, through reports, about the resolutions that have been published regarding their specific case.  

by Kelly Sanchez / Wednesday, 04 May 2022 / Published in GUEST CORNER, News

The use of the trademark is the main obligation acquired by the owner, something that is not necessarily fulfilled, especially when the Peruvian Trademark Law, in contrast with the Anglo-Saxon Law, its constituve and obey to the principle of the registration, which means that it is not require that the trademark be in use in order to earn the registration, allowing the economic agents to get the registration of trademarks that have never been or will never be use or will only have a temporary use.

For this reason, in many legislations of the world is regulated the trademark cancellation for lack of use, which will allow that economic agents with real intention of use the trademark to obtain the registration.

The cancellation for lack of use is also a means of defense for oppositions and one of the most used strategies to avoid possible denials for the existence of identical or similar trademarks already registered.

In our legislation, Article 165 of Decision 486, Common Regime on Industrial Property of the Commission of the Andean Community, states that:

“at the request of an interested party, the Competent National Office shall cancel the registration of a trademark that, without justified reason , had not been used by its owner, by a licensee or by another person authorized to do so in at least one of the Member Countries, during the three consecutive years preceding the date on which the cancellation action was initiated “(total cancellation) .

It also states that

“when the lack of use of a trademark only affects one or some of the products or services for which the trademark is registered, a reduction or limitation of the list of products or services included in the registration shall be ordered, eliminating those for which the mark had not been used; for this, the identity or similarity of the products or services must be taken into account. ” (partial cancelation).

It is precisely because of the complexity in the interpretation of the partial cancellation, that the Trademark Office of the National Institute for the Defense of Competition and the Protection of Intellectual Property (INDECOPI) had to issue precedents of mandatory observance, since in this modality not only It will take into account the suitability of proofs of use presented by the owner, but also the identity or similarity of the goods and / or services distinguished.

The first precedent regarding Partial Cancellation, was Resolution No. 1183 -2005 / TPI-INDECOPI, which partially canceled the registration of the Trademark “PETALO”, which distinguished “toilet paper, paper towels, napkins and paper handkerchiefs , cleansing paper, toilet paper and similar and other articles” of class 16 of the International Nice Classification, limiting it to distinguish only” toilet paper “.

The criteria established by the Office at that time, for the analysis of the identity or similarity of the goods and services were the following:

  • If the use of the trademark is proven for a good or service that was specifically detailed in the list, the registration for that specific good or service will be kept.
  • If the use of the trademark is proven for a good or service that was not specifically detailed in the list, but belongs or is similar to the other goods or services included in a genre that was specifically described in the list, the registration for that genre will be kept.

This precedent was modified by the second and current precedent, which is Resolution No. 2076-2016 / TPI-INDECOPI, which partially canceled the trademark “CORONA”, which distinguished “Exclusively hand tools” of class 08, limiting it to distinguish only “bows for butcher”.

In the first instance, as the owner had demonstrated the use of the trademark for “bows for butcher”, a product that was included in the “hand tools” genre, the cancellation was declared UNGROUNDED . However, the petitioner appealed claiming that as the use of the trademark was only demonstrated for “bows for butcher”, but nor for hand tools in general, the trademark should be partially cancelled, limiting it to distinguish only that specific good.

This argument, clearly simple but very strong, led the office to add a new criteria since in the practice it had been noted too, that in not all genres the products or services included are similar. For example, within the products include in the genre of “hand tools” of the class 08, it can be found “nail files” and “side arms”.

In this regard, the Court established the following:

  • If the use of the trademark is proven for a good or service that was not specifically detailed in the list but is included in a genre that was specifically described in the list, however it is not similar to the other goods of services of that genre, the registration will be kept only for that specific good or service.

This decision was very favorable for the petitioner, who could register in his favor the trademark “CORONA” to distinguish “exclusively nail clippers”, of the class 08, which had been denied in the first instance due to the existence of risk of confusion with the registered trademark “CORONA” that distinguished “only hand tools”, of the class 08.

In the examination of registrability, at first it was determined that besides that the trademarks shared as only relevant denomination the word “CORONA”, which generates phonetic similarity, there was also a link between the products since nail clippers are included in hand tools. However once the trademark was partially canceled and limited distinguish only “arches for butcher”, this link ceased to exist and the applicant was able to obtain in the second instance the registration of the trademark “CORONA” to distinguish “exclusively nail clippers”.

This case make us questioning, is the cancellation the most reliable strategy to obtain the registration of identical or similar trademarks that are already registered on behalf of other owners? Would not this be misleading to consumers? To answer these questions, it is important to point out that our trademark office tends to prevail the rights of the consumers over any other, and that is why the examination of registrability regarding the linking of products or services is very strict, even more if they are in the same class and / or genre.

In addition, because of the specialty principle, for which the trademarks only protect those goods or services for which they were registered, the coexistence of identical or similar is possible as long as there is no link between their goods or services.

For example, in Resolution No. 0007548-2018 / DSD-INDECOPI, issued on May 20, 2018, the application for registration of the trademark “RAE” to distinguish exclusively “underwear for men, boys, girls and women” of the class 25, was denied due to the existence of trademark “RAE” and device, registered on behalf of another owner to distinguish “Only bras” of the class 25.

reggiseno a marchio RAE

The registered trademark “RAE” and device, which in the beginning distinguished: “clothing, footwear, headgear”, was subject of a cancellation action started by the applicant almost at the same time of his trademark application, as a strategy to obtain the registration. However, the owner managed to prove the use of his trademark for “bras”, a product that belongs in the genre of “clothing”, therefore the authority in the second instance applied the mentioned precedent and decided to partially cancel the registration, limiting it to distinguish “only bras”.

As we see, unlike the case of the trademark “CORONA” this partial cancellation was not favorable for the applicant, since the products that remained in force were linked to the products of his requested trademark, which is why his application was denied.

In conclusion, although this precedent is debatable, it should not be taken as an incentive for the coexistence of identical and similar trademarks with different owners, which would create a risk of confusion for consumers, but rather as a way of reflecting a more accurate reality of the use of the trademark, favoring the fair competition in the market.

Finally, as not all of us have the luck of the applicant of “CORONA”, before starting a cancellation it is always advisable to do market studies of the trademark, because even though it means extra expenses, in the future it helps us avoid that, like the applicant of “RAE”, our strategy turns out a failure.


Did you find this article interesting? Share it!

They may also be interested in these items

Judgment of affinity between products

How to demonstrate genuine use of an EU trademark

Similar trademarks: similarity between the products

Do you need assistance, advice or information? If you have an idea, do not let it steal!

Contact Eva Troiani’s law firm

For registration and protection of trademarks

Find out why Mario decided to register his trademark

Register now your trademark!
Guest Corner

Last articles

  • Protection trademark in Turkey

    Under the light of Turkish Law: Why Should We Register Our Trademark?

    In a country where the trade in counterfeit pro...
  • Importance and advantages of registering a trademark in China

    Registering a trademark in China: importance and advantages

    Karson Yang, a Chinese trademark consultant, ex...
  • mark cosisting of advertising slogan

    Mark consisting of advertising slogans in the EU case-law

    The mark consisting of advertising slogans is a...
  • trademark registration in bad faith

    A brief analysis on examination of “an application for trademark registration in bad faith for a purpose other than use”

    Some tips and tricks from the Chinese colleague...
  • How to fight counterfeiting in Asia?

    It is important to ensure ownership of intellec...

Category

  • THE TRADEMARK
  • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN EUROPE
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN THE MIDDLE EAST
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN ASIA
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN NORTH AMERICA
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN LATIN AMERICA
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN OCEANIA
    • REGISTERING A TRADEMARK IN AFRICA
  • MISTAKES NOT TO BE MADE WITH TRADEMARKS
  • INSIGHTS INTO BRAND
    • CASE LAW AND TRADEMARK
    • DISTINCTIVE CHARACTER OF A TRADEMARK
    • COPYRIGHT
    • CONTRACTS RELATED TO TRADEMARKS
    • TRADEMARKS AND BAD FAITH
    • COUNTERFEITS AND MISLEADING INDICATIONS
    • UNFAIR COMPETITION
    • GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS
    • EUROPEAN UNION TRADEMARK

Subscribe to the newsletter

come contattare l’Avv. Eva Troiani

+393382938021

Utility

  • Eva Troiani law firm: trademark registration and legal protection
  • The Project Registrare-Marchio.com
  • Where to register a trademark
  • The Verification of Trademark’s Requirements
  • Trademark Search: identity and similarity
  • Filing a Trademark Application
  • Graphic Creation of a Trademark
  • Trademark protection: the surveillance service for the protection of your brand
  • Trademark Opposition Proceedings
  • Trademark Assignment and Licence Agreement

Contact

Eva Troiani (Attorney At Law)

P. Iva IT07106461002
+39.338.29.38.021
info@marchiebrevettiroma.it
  • GET SOCIAL
Registrare Marchio

registrare-marchio.com | Avv. Eva Troiani © 2015 - All rights reserved | Cookie policy | Privacy policy
The contents of this site provide readers with general information and are not legal advice.
Powered by
Ip Coster

TOP

Questo sito fa uso di cookie tecnici per permettere una corretta navigazione agli utenti e cookie di terze parti (come Google Analytics, Maps, ReCapcha, etc..) per migliorarne la fruizione. Se vuoi saperne di più consulta la nostra Cookie Policy.

Questo sito utilizza i cookie per fornire la migliore esperienza di navigazione possibile. Continuando a utilizzare questo sito senza modificare le impostazioni dei cookie o cliccando su "Accetta" permetti il loro utilizzo.

Chiudi