- Published in CASE LAW AND TRADEMARK, EUROPEAN UNION TRADEMARK
Evaluation criteria between products: are alcoholic beverages and energy drinks similar?
Monday, 29 October 2018
Let’s take into consideration the case of Red Bull, which charged a competitor for having registered a trademark in the two classes of beverages
Trademark consisting of 1 or 2 letters: trademark HP
Monday, 21 May 2018
Trademark consisting of 1 or 2 letters is absolutely valid and it is wrong to assume that this type of trademark is devoid of any distinctive character. EU Court reiterated this concept with reference to trademark HP. Find out why.
- Published in CASE LAW AND TRADEMARK, UNFAIR COMPETITION
Judgment of affinity between products
Sunday, 06 May 2018
In this article we explain how the judgment of affinity between products was decisive in a case concerning two well-known trademarks.
- Published in CASE LAW AND TRADEMARK, THE TRADEMARK
Family of trademarks: what they are
Wednesday, 02 May 2018
More trademarks can be considered a family (or series) of trademarks when, for example, “they reproduce in full the same distinctive element with the addition of an element, graphic or word, which differentiate them from each other, or when characterized by the repetition of a single prefix or suffix taken from an original mark”.
- Published in CASE LAW AND TRADEMARK, EUROPEAN UNION TRADEMARK
Descriptive trademarks with geographical names
Saturday, 28 April 2018
It is not always possible to register trademarks composed of geographical names. There are indeed some rules which have to be followed. In this article we speak about some rules affirmed in a judgment which can better clarify the issue.
- Published in CASE LAW AND TRADEMARK, EUROPEAN UNION TRADEMARK
Genuine use of EU trademark: the case Levi Strauss
Tuesday, 24 April 2018
Article 18, 1) of the EU trademark Regulation n. 2017/1001 provides that:
“If, within a period of five years following registration, the proprietor has not put the EU trade mark to genuine use in the Union in connection with the goods or services in respect of which it is registered, or if such use has been suspended during an uninterrupted period of five years, the EU trade mark shall be subject to the sanctions provided for in this Regulation, unless there are proper reasons for non-use”.
- Published in CASE LAW AND TRADEMARK, THE TRADEMARK
Complex trademark and composite trademark: what is the difference?
Tuesday, 24 April 2018
Quite recently the Italian Corte di Cassazione informed us on the difference between the complex trademark and the composite trademark (judgements n. 1275 and 1276, both of January 25, 2016) and it precisely outlined the difference between the two categories of brands, which lies in the distinctiveness of the elements of which they are composed.
- Published in CASE LAW AND TRADEMARK, EUROPEAN UNION TRADEMARK
Exhaustion of the right of a trademark and its limitations
Tuesday, 17 April 2018
The owner of a trademark cannot prevent free circulation of its products after they have been placed on the market: this principle, called exhaustion of the right of a trademark, has some limita-tions. Let’s see them together.
- Published in CASE LAW AND TRADEMARK
Patronymic trademark: the distinctiveness in cases of homonymy
Monday, 16 April 2018
In cases of homonymy of patronymic trademarks (namely trademarks consisting of name and surname or only surname) the other elements constituting the trademark can become decisive. We mention some judgments about it.
- Published in CASE LAW AND TRADEMARK
Figurative trademark and complex trademark
Monday, 16 April 2018
In this decision UIBM compared a figurative and a complex trademark, having in common a similar image. Find out the result.

English
Italiano 








